关灯

How do impact investors resolve the "measurement paradox" when social outcomes in developing countries lack reliable data?

[复制链接]
Mabel 发表于 昨天 01:35 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式 打印 上一主题 下一主题
 
Impact investing in developing nations struggles with poor data availability—e.g., tracking job quality at a local small business or long-term environmental benefits . This creates a paradox: investors need to prove impact but lack tools to measure it accurately. How are firms addressing this? Do they use AI to analyze proxy data (e.g., mobile payment activity as a job indicator), or partner with local NGOs to collect ground-level metrics? I want to explore hybrid measurement models that balance scalability with accuracy, and how they justify investments to stakeholders when hard data is scarce.

回复

使用道具 举报

 
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

排行榜

关注我们:微信订阅号

官方微信

APP下载

全国服务热线:

4000-018-018

公司地址:上海市嘉定区银翔路655号B区1068室

运营中心:成都市锦江区东华正街42号广电仕百达国际大厦25楼

邮编:610066 Email:125422921#qq.com

Copyright   ©2015-2016  gonglubianPowered by©Discuz!技术支持:极点素材